![]() ![]()
The component approach has long made other databases quicker than FileMaker, but it's the development cycle combined with the ease-of-use that makes FileMaker win out. ![]() Since Access is broken down modularly there is a speed difference in that Access is faster because you have to create your own indexes. This means you can "trap" for field entry and exit events as well as mouse and key events. He mentioned something that reinforced the rapid development environment that is so loved in FileMaker Pro, "If someone says they can do it faster in Access, they're lying." Eric said that while he finds a lot of features in Access that cannot be found in FileMaker he still prefers FileMaker because he can develop in one week to one month what could take four to five months in Access.Īccess, he said, does offer a higher level of event support. Eric had a lot of information to share about the difference between the two and even helped me with my own understanding of what makes FileMaker such a popular program. I knew that Eric had worked with Access for quite a bit of time on a project that needed Access work according to the client he was serving. ![]() He owns his own consulting practice and was a Claris employee a while ago. His name is Eric Culver and has been one of the trainers for the FileMaker training that Claris provides. There was one other person that I decided to talk to whom I knew had some working Access knowledge. It was a pleasure to learn again from a true FileMaker evangelist! We really enjoyed Mike's presentation to the FileMaker SIG. This translates into more competitive bids for Mike and lower costs for his clients. Mike told us that FileMaker's ease-of-use means he can develop a solution in 20-50% less time than in other databases. The relational features have been added in unique ways which are easier to use and understand than other databases. Mike said the ease-of-use for which FileMaker is noted has been increased another notch in version 3.0. With FileMaker Pro Server it can support multiple network protocols simultaneously including AppleTalk, NetWare IPX/SPX, and TCP/IP. It can run over the Internet via TCP/IP directly from FileMaker without using a Web browser. And it is also a visually driven development environment. Filemaker pro 12 vs access how to#It has strong scripting commands which are easy to use without learning how to program. Filemaker pro 12 vs access windows#It runs on multiple operating systems including Macintosh System 7, Windows 95, Windows NT, and now Windows 3.1 with Win32s installed. FileMaker Pro 3.0 balances these rather esoteric features with several important advantages: In response to questions about the differences between Access and FileMaker 3.0, Mike acknowledged that Access has some features that FileMaker does not, such as the ability to program field colors, the ability to log database activities, and access to Visual Basic. Finally, last December, FileMaker 3.0 arrived just in time to keep Mike from slipping into the Microsoft/Access pit! In addition, Access is relational - the missing piece in FileMaker Pro until this year. Filemaker pro 12 vs access Pc#Indeed, Access is to many PC users what FileMaker is to many Mac users: moderately priced, easy to use, and widely accepted. Mike pointed out that Access has steadily improved because Microsoft has upgraded it every six months or so. Many of his customers are PC users and favor Access, from Microsoft. Filemaker pro 12 vs access upgrade#So, we were delighted when Mike agreed to be the guest speaker for our May meeting we were anxious to hear his assessment of the long awaited upgrade to our favorite database.Īt the beginning of the meeting Mike stated that after three years of vaporware promises from Claris he had given up on Claris releasing the relational version of FileMaker. With the release of FM 3.0 last December, our SIG has been in a tizzy of excitement and wonderment about the new tools we now have to use. Unfortunately, the success of his business has kept Mike away from our meetings for the last two years. We soon discovered that Michael was a real FileMaker evangelist and an excellent teacher. Needless to say, we quickly enlisted him to teach in our FileMaker SIG. When Michael Margolis came to our club (the Apple Corps of Dallas) several years ago we learned he was an experienced database developer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |